1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

The journal “Medicine and Art” accepts reviews, as well as original articles in the form of research or scientific-practical works that have not previously been published or accepted for publication.

Particularly welcome are works of an interdisciplinary nature, including articles of a scientific and journalistic nature that draw the attention of a wide audience to the most interesting and important problems. Only manuscripts drawn up in accordance with these Rules, approved by the editors, are accepted for consideration. All authors listed in the article are responsible for its content. Before sending the article to the editor, the author must check its originality using the resource https://www.antiplagiat.ru/.

The article must have an originality level of at least 70% for review and at least 80% for original research and clinical observation. Repetition in a volume greater than 20%, even in own previously published texts, is not allowed, because it does not carry an increment of scientific knowledge and is classified by COPE as recycling.

The manuscript is submitted electronically in the text editor Microsoft Word in Word Document 97-2003 (*.doc) or Word Document (*.docx) formats.

The text is typed in Times New Roman, size—14 pt, line spacing—1.5, words without hyphens. Margin sizes: top, bottom and right—20 mm, left—30 mm. Text justification. The journal publishes materials subject to the mandatory presence of a positive review and approval by the Editor-in-Chief.

Articles provided by authors commissioned by the editorial board and approved by reviewers, are published free of charge.

In other cases, compensation of the publishing costs is indicated in the price list below:

1 page of text, including references – 20 $
Reproducing illustrations: one color or black and white illustration – 10 $

The volume of the original article is up to 15 typewritten pages, the review is up to 25. This volume includes figures and tables, the list of references does not. In some cases, in agreement with the editors, an increase in volume is permissible. All materials received by the editors and complying with the requirements of these rules are subject to review.

2. MANUSCRIPTS STRUCTURE 

2.1 Reviews:

Abstract (150–250 words) with keywords (up to 10 words)
Introduction
Main part
Conclusions/conclusion
References
Contact information
About the authors

2.2 Original articles:

Abstract (150–250 words) with keywords (up to 10 words)
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
The discussion
Conclusions conclusion
Funding source and conflict of interest
References
Contact information
About the authors

The abstract should contain in a concise form the main content of the article, the title of which cannot be duplicated. Abbreviations and abbreviations are not allowed. The number of tables and figures should be minimal (no more than five units in total, each no more than half an A4 sheet).

3. DESIGN

All pages of the publication, starting from the title page, must be numbered (location—footer, middle of the page).

The following lines are in order:

— The title of the work is placed in the center, typed in bold without indents, the first word starts with a capital letter, the rest of the letters in the words are lowercase (except for proper names, common abbreviations, etc.). Do not put a dot at the end of the title.

—The line following the title is the initials and surnames of the authors. Bold font is used.

— Below is the name of the organization (organizations), typed in italics, indicating the city and country.

An example of the design of the article “header”:

PROSPECTS OF APPLICATION OF THE SCIENTIFIC MUSIC THERAPY INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN REHABILITATION OF PATIENTS WITH COVID-19

Shushardzhan S. ¹ , Eremina N. ², Shushardzhan R.³

¹ National Medical Research Center of Rehabilitation and Balneology» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

^2-3 The Scientific Research Center for Music Therapy and Healthcare Technologies, Moscow, Russia

Section titles are printed with a capital letter without a dot at the end (bold type), the words “references” are typed in capital letters (regular type). Before the list of references, the authors should place information about the funding of the work.

As an example, the following wording options are suggested:

Source of financing:
Option 1: The authors declare no funding for the study.
Option 2: The study was financially supported by … (indicate the name of the organization and project number, No. 00-00-00000)”.

Conflict of interest:
The authors declare the absence of obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.

References.

The list of references is placed at the end of the text part of the manuscript. Bibliographic entries in the list of off-text bibliographic references are numbered and arranged not alphabetically, but in the order of citation in exact accordance with their numbering in the text of the article (for example, [1, 2, 3]). In original articles, no more than 25 sources are recommended, in reviews—no more than 35, in lectures and other materials—up to 15. Adding your own previously published texts to the article in an acceptable volume is made according to all citation rules, including the indication of the source.

At the end of the article, after the list of references, contact information about the authors is provided.

1. Surname, name, patronymic of the author(s), academic degree, title and main position.
2. Full name of the institution and department (department, laboratory) in which the work was performed, as well as the full postal address of the institution.
3. Email address of the author(s), ORCHID ID.

Example:

Information about the authors:
Sergey V. Shushardzhan, Doc. Sci. (Med), Professor, CEO «Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine, Clinical Psychology and Music Therapy».
E-mail: medart777@yandex.ru, ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0945-7704
Tatyana L. Allik, Rehabilitologist, CEO of the Rehabilitation Center «Doctor Music from Estonia» OÜ.E- mail: info@muusikaravi.eu, ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2430-2508
Natalya I. Eremina, Cand. Sci. (Med), Music Therapist, Clinical Psychologist, Leading Specialist of the «Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine, Clinical Psychology and Music Therapy» LLC, EAMT Professor.E-mail: medart888@yandex.ru, ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9111-4852

Contribution:
Shushardzhan S. V. — concept and design of the study;
Allik T. L. — a collection of material;
Eremina N. I. — implementation of the text part of the work.

The editors, editorial board, reviewers, and publisher of the journal "Medicine and Art" rely In their activities on the recommendations developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

1. Before making a decision on article publication, the editor of a scientific journal is guided by the reliability of the presentation of data and the scientific significance of the work in question.
2. The editor should not allow information to be published if there is sufficient reason to believe that it is plagiarism.
3. The editor, together with the publisher, should not leave unanswered claims regarding the reviewed manuscripts or published materials, and also, if a conflict situation is identified, take all necessary measures to restore violated rights.
4. The editor must evaluate the intellectual content of manuscripts regardless of the race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, origin, citizenship, social status, or political preferences of the authors.
5. Unpublished data obtained from submitted manuscripts should not be used for personal purposes or transferred to third parties without the written consent of the author. Information or ideas obtained during editing and related to possible benefits must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.

Ethical principles in the activities of the reviewer

1. A manuscript received for review should be considered a confidential document that cannot be transferred for review or discussion to third parties who do not have permission from the editors.
2. The reviewer is obliged to give an objective and reasoned assessment of the stated results of the study. Personal criticism of the author is unacceptable.
3. Unpublished data obtained from submitted manuscripts should not be used by the reviewer for personal purposes.
4. A reviewer who, in his opinion, does not have sufficient qualifications to evaluate the manuscript, or cannot be objective, for example, in case of a conflict of interest with the author or organization, should inform the editor about this, with a request to exclude him from the review process of this manuscript.

Ethical requirements for authors of scientific publications

All scientific articles submitted to the editors of the journal “Medicine and Art” undergo mandatory blind peer review (the authors of the manuscript do not know the reviewers).
The text of the article is checked by the executive secretary for compliance with the “rules for authors” of the journal and its subject, at this stage the article may be rejected. If the article meets the subject and formal requirements for manuscripts, then the text is submitted to two reviewers.
Reviews (without information about the reviewer) are sent to the authors, who must respond to the reviewer's comments and make corrections or write why they do not agree with the comments (term: 1 week).
The editors send the author's response to the reviewer.
If an article receives two negative reviews, it is rejected.If one review is positive and the second is negative, the decision to publish or reject the article is made at a meeting of the editorial board; in some cases the article is sent to another reviewer.If the revision of the manuscript in accordance with the comments of the reviewers takes the authors more than two weeks, the date of receipt of the manuscript to the editorial office is changed.

 Articles are retracted in accordance with the recommendations of the Association of Science Editors and Publishers (ANRI) in the event of detection of the following violations:

• errors in the publication that call into question its scientific value;
• manipulation of experimental data and other falsifications;
• plagiarism in publication or duplication of an article in other publications;
• inclusion in the article of persons who do not meet the criteria for authorship; identifying conflicts of interest and other non-compliance with the ethics of scientific publications.

Dear readers!

In accordance with the requirements of the bibliographic systems, the materials of journals that are in the public domain are published in separate articles.However, most people like to have full versions of the journal.

We provide such an opportunity!

Readers who have subscribed to the journal "Medicine and Art" for the entire period of subscription will be sent the full number of each issue in PDF format. The cost of an annual subscription is 8480 rubles.
For 2023, only a semi-annual subscription is available – the cost is 4240 rubles.
To subscribe, send us a free-form short application to medart777@yandex.ru, indicating your full name and personal details, or the name of the organization with details.An invoice will be issued, after payment of which the subscription will begin to operate.

Attention authors!

At the request of authors who wish to purchase a printed version of the journal with their publication as a keepsake or as a gift, we inform you that this is possible on an individual order. The  "Medicine and Art" is an electronic journal. The cost of 1 copy is 5000 rubles (exclusive issue in a small circulation).

Preyskurant osnovnyh i dopolnitel'nyh uslug zhurnala «Medicina i Iskusstvo»

Dear friends!

You are on the website of the international scientific peer reviewed journal “Medicine and Art”. This is an interdisciplinary project for joining scientists from various fields: medical doctors, psychologists, music therapists, artists, art therapists, tutors, as well as IT specialists.

The main goal of the journal is a synthesis of scientific and practical information useful for the health promotion, prolongation of life and improvement of its quality.

Striking examples of such integration are such areas as music therapy and art therapy, which have received global distribution in the world today. Intensive research is going on in scientific institutions, which, thanks to interdisciplinary approaches, have significantly expanded the boundaries of the application of art not only in medicine and psychology, but also in modern biotechnology.

Contributors are welcome to submit their articles in the following areas:

1. Medicine
2. Psychology
3. Philosophy, aesthetics
4. Cultural studies and art history
5. Biological sciences
6. Acoustics: medical, musical, biological, cellular, etc.
7. Music Therapy.
8. Art Therapy
9. Cognitive sciences
10. Correctional pedagogy
11. Information technologies in Medicine and Psychology
12. Innovative methods of treatment, rehabilitation and psychological care.

The journal is in the open access, so publishing on its pages is the shortest way to wide popularization of the scientific research results and practical achievements.

The interdisciplinary disposition of the journal allows like-minded people from related areas to unite to solve important for mankind problems.

The editorial policy of the journal is aimed at creating the most comfortable conditions for contributors.

We cooperate with well-known universities in different countries: Capilano University (Canada), Timişoara University (Romania), Plymouth University (UK) and others, as well as with the world's largest publishers of scientific journals and books: Springer, Routledge, Chapman and Hall, CRS Press etc.

Contributors are welcome to submit their articles to the coming edition of the “Medicine and Art” journal.

The section was prepared based on the materials of the publishing house of scientific and medical literature Elsevier, as well as on the materials of the International Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)

1. Introduction
1.1. The publication of materials in peer-reviewed journals is a simple way of scientific communication and makes a significant contribution to the development of the relevant field of scientific knowledge. Thus, it is important for the journal "Medicine and Art" to set standards for the future ethical behavior of all parties involved in the publication, namely: Authors, Editors of the journal, Reviewers, Publisher and the Scientific community.
1.2. The publisher of the journal not only supports scientific communication and invests in this process, but is also responsible for following all modern recommendations in the published work.
1.3. The publisher is committed to the strictest supervision of scientific materials. Our journal programs provide an impartial "report" of the development of scientific thought and research, so we are also aware of the responsibility for the proper presentation of these "reports", especially in terms of the ethical aspects of the publications outlined in this document.

2. Responsibilities of Editors
2.1. Publication decision The editor of the scientific journal "Medicine and Art" is personally and independently responsible for making the decision to publish, often in cooperation with the relevant scientific community. The credibility of the work in question and its scientific significance should always underlie the decision to publish. The editor may be subject to the policy of the Editorial Board of the Journal of Medicine and Art, being limited by current legal requirements regarding defamation, copyright, legality and plagiarism. The Editor may confer with other Editors and Reviewers (or officials of the Academia) when making a decision about publication.
2.2. Decency The editor must evaluate the intellectual content of manuscripts regardless of the race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, origin, citizenship or political preferences of the Authors.
2.3. Confidentiality The Editor and the Editorial Board of the journal "Medicine and Art" are obliged not to unnecessarily disclose information about the accepted manuscript to all persons, with the exception of Authors, Reviewers, potential Reviewers, other scientific consultants and the Publisher.
2.4. Disclosure Policy and Conflicts of Interest
2.4.1 Unpublished data obtained from submitted manuscripts cannot be used in personal research without the written consent of the Author. Information or ideas obtained during the review and related to possible benefits must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.
2.4.2 Editors should recuse themselves from reviewing manuscripts and making decisions about publication (request a Co-Editor, Assistant Editor or cooperate with other members of the Editorial Board) in case of conflicts of interest due to competitive, collaborative and other interactions and relationships with Authors, companies or other organizations associated with the manuscript.
2.5. Publication oversight An editor who provides compelling evidence that a statement or conclusion made in a publication is erroneous must notify the Publisher for prompt notice of changes, retractions, concerns, and other relevant statements.
2.6. Research engagement and collaboration The Editor, together with the Publisher, shall take adequate measures in the event of ethical claims regarding the reviewed manuscripts or published materials. Such measures generally include interaction with the Authors of the manuscript and the argumentation of the corresponding complaint or requirement, but may also involve interaction with relevant organizations and research centers.

3. Responsibilities of Reviewers
3.1. Influence on the decisions of the Editorial Board Peer review helps the Editor make the decision to publish and, through appropriate interaction with Authors, can also help the Author improve the quality of the work. Peer review is a necessary link in formal scientific communications, located at the very “heart” of the scientific approach. The publisher shares the view that all scholars who wish to contribute to a publication are required to do substantial peer review work.
3.2. diligence Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the manuscript and/or does not have enough time to quickly complete the work should notify the Editor of the Journal of Medicine and Art and ask to be excluded from the review process of the corresponding manuscript.
3.3. Confidentiality Any manuscript received for peer review must be treated as a confidential document. This work may not be disclosed or discussed with anyone not authorized by the Editor.
3.4. Manuscript requirements and objectivity The reviewer is obliged to give an objective assessment. Personal criticism of the Author is unacceptable. Reviewers should clearly and reasonably express their opinion.
3.5. Recognition of primary sources Reviewers should identify significant published work that is relevant to the topic and not included in the bibliography of the manuscript. For any statement (observation, conclusion or argument) published earlier, the manuscript must have a corresponding bibliographic reference. The Reviewer should also draw the attention of the Editor to the discovery of significant similarities or coincidences between the manuscript in question and any other published work that is within the scope of the Reviewer's scientific competence.

3.6. Disclosure Policy and Conflicts of Interest
3.6.1 Unpublished data obtained from submitted manuscripts cannot be used in personal research without the written consent of the Author. Information or ideas obtained during the review and related to possible benefits must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.
3.6.2. Reviewers should not participate in the review of manuscripts in case of conflicts of interest due to competitive, joint and other interactions and relationships with any of the Authors, companies or other organizations associated with the submitted work.

4. Responsibilities of Authors
4.1. Manuscript Requirements
4.1.1 Authors of original research reports should provide credible results of the work done, as well as an objective discussion of the significance of the research. The data underlying the work must be accurately presented. The work must contain sufficient details and bibliographic references for possible reproduction. False or knowingly erroneous statements are perceived as unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
4.1.2. Reviews and scientific articles must also be accurate and objective, the point of view of the Editors must be clearly indicated.

4.2. Data access and storage Raw data relevant to a manuscript may be requested from Authors for review by Editors. Authors should be prepared to provide public access to this kind of information (according to the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if feasible, and in any case be prepared to retain this data for an adequate period of time after publication.

4.3. Originality and plagiarism
4.3.1 Authors must ensure that the work presented is entirely original and, in the case of using works or statements of other Authors, must provide appropriate bibliographic references or excerpts.
4.3.2 Plagiarism can exist in many forms, from presenting someone else's work as the author's, to copying or paraphrasing significant parts of someone else's work (without attribution) to claiming one's own rights to the results of someone else's research. Plagiarism in all forms is unethical and is unacceptable.

4.4. Plurality, redundancy and simultaneity of publications
4.4.1 In general, an Author should not publish a manuscript mostly devoted to the same research in more than one journal as an original publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal at the same time is perceived as unethical behavior and is unacceptable.
4.4.2. In general, the Author should not submit a previously published article for consideration to another journal.
4.4.3. Publishing a certain type of article (eg, clinical practice guidelines, translated articles) in more than one journal is ethical in some cases, subject to certain conditions. Authors and Editors of interested journals must agree to a secondary publication presenting necessarily the same data and interpretations as in the primary published work. A bibliography of the primary work should also be included in the second publication. More information on acceptable forms of secondary (repeated) publications can be found at www.icmje.org.

4.5. Recognition of primary sources The contribution of others must always be acknowledged. Authors should cite publications that are relevant to the performance of the submitted work. Data obtained privately, for example, in the course of a conversation, correspondence or discussion with third parties, should not be used or presented without the express written permission of the original source. Information obtained from confidential sources, such as evaluation of manuscripts or awards of grants, should not be used without the express written permission of the Authors of the work related to confidential sources.

4.6. Publication authorship
4.6.1 The authors of the publication can only be persons who have made a significant contribution to the formation of the concept of the work, the development, execution or interpretation of the presented research. All those who have made significant contributions should be designated as Contributors. Where research participants have made significant contributions in a particular area of research project, they should be listed as having made significant contributions to the research.
4.6.2. The author must make sure that all participants who have made a significant contribution to the study are presented as Co-Authors and are not listed as Co-Authors those who did not participate in the study, that all Co-Authors have seen and approved the final version of the work and agreed to submit it for publication.

4.7. Risks, as well as people and animals that are the objects of research
4.7.1. If the work involves the use of chemicals, procedures, or equipment that may involve any unusual risk, the Author must clearly indicate this in the manuscript.
4.7.2 If the work involves the participation of animals or people as objects of research, the Authors must make sure that the manuscript indicates that all stages of the study comply with the laws and regulations of research organizations, and are approved by the relevant committees. The manuscript should clearly state that informed consent has been obtained from all subjects of research. Privacy rights must always be respected.

4.8. Disclosure Policy and Conflicts of Interest
4.8.1 All Authors are required to disclose in their manuscripts financial or other existing conflicts of interest that may be perceived as affecting the results or conclusions presented in the work.
4.8.2 Examples of potential conflicts of interest that must be disclosed include employment, consulting, stock ownership, royalties, expert opinions, patent applications or patent registrations, grants, and other financial support. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed as early as possible.

4.9. Significant errors in published works If the Author finds significant errors or inaccuracies in the publication, the Author must inform the Editor of the journal "Medicine and Art" about this and interact with the Editor in order to withdraw the publication or correct errors as soon as possible. If the Editor or the Publisher receives information from a third party that the publication contains significant errors, the Author is obliged to withdraw the work or correct the errors as soon as possible.

5. Responsibilities of the Publisher
5.1 The Publisher shall follow the principles and procedures that promote, in accordance with these requirements, the fulfillment of ethical obligations by the Editors, Reviewers and Authors of the journal "Medicine and Art". The Publisher must be sure that the potential profit from advertising or reprint production does not influence the Editors' decisions.
5.2. The Publisher shall support the Editors of the journal "Medicine and Art" in handling complaints about the ethical aspects of published materials and assist in interacting with other journals and / or Publishers, if this facilitates the performance of duties by the Editors.
5.3. The publisher should promote good research practice and implement industry standards to improve ethical guidelines, withdrawal procedures, and error correction.
5.4 The publisher must provide appropriate specialized legal support (opinion or advice) if necessary. The section was prepared based on the materials of the publishing house of scientific and medical literature Elsevier, as well as materials of the International Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Founders LLC "Academy of Medical Rehabilitation, Clinical Psychology and Music Therapy".

Disclosure Policy and Conflicts of Interest
Unpublished data obtained from submitted manuscripts cannot be used in personal research without the written consent of the Author. Information or ideas obtained during the review and related to possible benefits must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not participate in the review of manuscripts in case of conflicts of interest due to competitive, joint and other interactions and relationships with any of the Authors, companies or other organizations associated with the submitted work.

Policy for posting preprints and postprints
During the article submission process, the author needs to confirm that the article has not been published or has not been accepted for publication in another scientific journal. When linking to an article published in the journal "Medicine and Art", the publisher asks to place a link (full URL of the material) to the official website of the journal. Articles previously posted by authors on personal or public sites that are not related to other publishers are allowed for consideration.

Borrowing and plagiarism
The presence of plagiarism in manuscripts submitted to the journal "Medicine and Art" is unacceptable. The editorial board, when considering an article, can verify the authenticity of the submitted material using the Anti-plagiarism system.

Plagiarism is considered:
1 - copying text from other sources without attribution;
2 - copying ideas, images or data from other sources without attribution;
3 - reuse by the authors of the submitted manuscript of the text from their own articles published earlier (an exception may be copying the section "Materials and Methods");
4 - use of an idea from another source, described in your own words, without attribution.
If plagiarism is detected during the peer review process, the manuscript may be rejected. In case of detection of numerous borrowings, the editors act in accordance with the COPE rules.

1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

The journal “Medicine and Art” accepts reviews, as well as original articles in the form of research or scientific-practical works that have not previously been published or accepted for publication.

Particularly welcome are works of an interdisciplinary nature, including articles of a scientific and journalistic nature that draw the attention of a wide audience to the most interesting and important problems. Only manuscripts drawn up in accordance with these Rules, approved by the editors, are accepted for consideration. All authors listed in the article are responsible for its content. Before sending the article to the editor, the author must check its originality using the resource https://www.antiplagiat.ru/.

The article must have an originality level of at least 70% for review and at least 80% for original research and clinical observation. Repetition in a volume greater than 20%, even in own previously published texts, is not allowed, because it does not carry an increment of scientific knowledge and is classified by COPE as recycling.

The manuscript is submitted electronically in the text editor Microsoft Word in Word Document 97-2003 (*.doc) or Word Document (*.docx) formats.

The text is typed in Times New Roman, size—14 pt, line spacing—1.5, words without hyphens. Margin sizes: top, bottom and right—20 mm, left—30 mm. Text justification. The journal publishes materials subject to the mandatory presence of a positive review and approval by the Editor-in-Chief.

Articles provided by authors commissioned by the editorial board and approved by reviewers, are published free of charge.

In other cases, compensation of the publishing costs is indicated in the price list below:

1 page of text, including references – 20 $
Reproducing illustrations: one color or black and white illustration – 10 $

The volume of the original article is up to 15 typewritten pages, the review is up to 25. This volume includes figures and tables, the list of references does not. In some cases, in agreement with the editors, an increase in volume is permissible. All materials received by the editors and complying with the requirements of these rules are subject to review.

2. MANUSCRIPTS STRUCTURE 

2.1 Reviews:

Abstract (150–250 words) with keywords (up to 10 words)
Introduction
Main part
Conclusions/conclusion
References
Contact information
About the authors

2.2 Original articles:

Abstract (150–250 words) with keywords (up to 10 words)
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
The discussion
Conclusions conclusion
Funding source and conflict of interest
References
Contact information
About the authors

The abstract should contain in a concise form the main content of the article, the title of which cannot be duplicated. Abbreviations and abbreviations are not allowed. The number of tables and figures should be minimal (no more than five units in total, each no more than half an A4 sheet).

3. DESIGN

All pages of the publication, starting from the title page, must be numbered (location—footer, middle of the page).

The following lines are in order:

— The title of the work is placed in the center, typed in bold without indents, the first word starts with a capital letter, the rest of the letters in the words are lowercase (except for proper names, common abbreviations, etc.). Do not put a dot at the end of the title.

—The line following the title is the initials and surnames of the authors. Bold font is used.

— Below is the name of the organization (organizations), typed in italics, indicating the city and country.

An example of the design of the article “header”:

PROSPECTS OF APPLICATION OF THE SCIENTIFIC MUSIC THERAPY INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN REHABILITATION OF PATIENTS WITH COVID-19

Shushardzhan S. ¹ , Eremina N. ², Shushardzhan R.³

¹ National Medical Research Center of Rehabilitation and Balneology» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

^2-3 The Scientific Research Center for Music Therapy and Healthcare Technologies, Moscow, Russia

Section titles are printed with a capital letter without a dot at the end (bold type), the words “references” are typed in capital letters (regular type). Before the list of references, the authors should place information about the funding of the work.

As an example, the following wording options are suggested:

Source of financing:
Option 1: The authors declare no funding for the study.
Option 2: The study was financially supported by … (indicate the name of the organization and project number, No. 00-00-00000)”.

Conflict of interest:
The authors declare the absence of obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.

References.

The list of references is placed at the end of the text part of the manuscript. Bibliographic entries in the list of off-text bibliographic references are numbered and arranged not alphabetically, but in the order of citation in exact accordance with their numbering in the text of the article (for example, [1, 2, 3]). In original articles, no more than 25 sources are recommended, in reviews—no more than 35, in lectures and other materials—up to 15. Adding your own previously published texts to the article in an acceptable volume is made according to all citation rules, including the indication of the source.

At the end of the article, after the list of references, contact information about the authors is provided.

1. Surname, name, patronymic of the author(s), academic degree, title and main position.
2. Full name of the institution and department (department, laboratory) in which the work was performed, as well as the full postal address of the institution.
3. Email address of the author(s), ORCHID ID.

Example:

Information about the authors:
Sergey V. Shushardzhan, Doc. Sci. (Med), Professor, CEO «Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine, Clinical Psychology and Music Therapy».
E-mail: medart777@yandex.ru, ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0945-7704
Tatyana L. Allik, Rehabilitologist, CEO of the Rehabilitation Center «Doctor Music from Estonia» OÜ.E- mail: info@muusikaravi.eu, ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2430-2508
Natalya I. Eremina, Cand. Sci. (Med), Music Therapist, Clinical Psychologist, Leading Specialist of the «Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine, Clinical Psychology and Music Therapy» LLC, EAMT Professor.E-mail: medart888@yandex.ru, ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9111-4852

Contribution:
Shushardzhan S. V. — concept and design of the study;
Allik T. L. — a collection of material;
Eremina N. I. — implementation of the text part of the work.

The editors, editorial board, reviewers, and publisher of the journal "Medicine and Art" rely In their activities on the recommendations developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

1. Before making a decision on article publication, the editor of a scientific journal is guided by the reliability of the presentation of data and the scientific significance of the work in question.
2. The editor should not allow information to be published if there is sufficient reason to believe that it is plagiarism.
3. The editor, together with the publisher, should not leave unanswered claims regarding the reviewed manuscripts or published materials, and also, if a conflict situation is identified, take all necessary measures to restore violated rights.
4. The editor must evaluate the intellectual content of manuscripts regardless of the race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, origin, citizenship, social status, or political preferences of the authors.
5. Unpublished data obtained from submitted manuscripts should not be used for personal purposes or transferred to third parties without the written consent of the author. Information or ideas obtained during editing and related to possible benefits must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.

Ethical principles in the activities of the reviewer

1. A manuscript received for review should be considered a confidential document that cannot be transferred for review or discussion to third parties who do not have permission from the editors.
2. The reviewer is obliged to give an objective and reasoned assessment of the stated results of the study. Personal criticism of the author is unacceptable.
3. Unpublished data obtained from submitted manuscripts should not be used by the reviewer for personal purposes.
4. A reviewer who, in his opinion, does not have sufficient qualifications to evaluate the manuscript, or cannot be objective, for example, in case of a conflict of interest with the author or organization, should inform the editor about this, with a request to exclude him from the review process of this manuscript.

Ethical requirements for authors of scientific publications

Redakciya prinimaet dlya razmescheniya reklamnye materialy v vide statey, soobscheniy ili bannerov, soderzhanie kotoryh ne protivorechit napravlennosti zhurnala i deystvuyuschemu zakonodatel'stvu.  Pri publikacii reklamnogo materiala (v lyubom vide) obyazatel'no stavitsya pometka «Na pravah reklamy».

Reklamnaya informaciya mozhet byt' tak zhe opublikovana v razdele Novosti (naprimer, press-reliz ili daydzhest) v vide otdel'nogo soobscheniya.

Bannernaya reklama i reklama v razdele Novosti osuschestvlyaetsya na dogovornoy osnove.

Zayavki prisylat' na pochtu medart888@yandex.ru

 «Medicina i Iskusstvo» - eto mezhdunarodnyy recenziruemyy nauchnyy zhurnal otkrytogo dostupa.
 Deyatel'nost' finansiruetsya za schet avtorov i reklamnyh postupleniy.
Oplata izdatel'skih uslug osuschestvlyaetsya avtorami tol'ko v tom sluchae, esli podannye imi materialy poluchayut polozhitel'nuyu recenziyu i prohodyat proverku na plagiat.
 Sredstva, poluchennye za redaktirovanie, nabor teksta, pravku, verstku i formatirovanie (PDF, XML, HTML), rashoduyutsya na oplatu peredachi opublikovannyh statey v eLIBRARY.RU i drugie bazy dannyh, na podderzhanie sayta zhurnala, obespechenie postoyannogo dostupa k opublikovannym stat'yam.
 Stat'i, predostavlennye aspirantami, a takzhe avtorami po zakazu redkollegii i odobrennye recenzentami, pechatayutsya na bezvozmezdnoy dlya avtorov osnove.
V ostal'nyh sluchayah avtory kompensiruyut izdatel'skie rashody po podgotovke stat'i k publikacii na osnovanii utverzhdennogo prays-lista.

All scientific articles submitted to the editors of the journal “Medicine and Art” undergo mandatory blind peer review (the authors of the manuscript do not know the reviewers).
The text of the article is checked by the executive secretary for compliance with the “rules for authors” of the journal and its subject, at this stage the article may be rejected. If the article meets the subject and formal requirements for manuscripts, then the text is submitted to two reviewers.
Reviews (without information about the reviewer) are sent to the authors, who must respond to the reviewer's comments and make corrections or write why they do not agree with the comments (term: 1 week).
The editors send the author's response to the reviewer.
If an article receives two negative reviews, it is rejected.If one review is positive and the second is negative, the decision to publish or reject the article is made at a meeting of the editorial board; in some cases the article is sent to another reviewer.If the revision of the manuscript in accordance with the comments of the reviewers takes the authors more than two weeks, the date of receipt of the manuscript to the editorial office is changed.

 Articles are retracted in accordance with the recommendations of the Association of Science Editors and Publishers (ANRI) in the event of detection of the following violations:

• errors in the publication that call into question its scientific value;
• manipulation of experimental data and other falsifications;
• plagiarism in publication or duplication of an article in other publications;
• inclusion in the article of persons who do not meet the criteria for authorship; identifying conflicts of interest and other non-compliance with the ethics of scientific publications.

Preyskurant osnovnyh i dopolnitel'nyh uslug zhurnala «Medicina i Iskusstvo»

Dear readers!

In accordance with the requirements of the bibliographic systems, the materials of journals that are in the public domain are published in separate articles.However, most people like to have full versions of the journal.

We provide such an opportunity!

Readers who have subscribed to the journal "Medicine and Art" for the entire period of subscription will be sent the full number of each issue in PDF format. The cost of an annual subscription is 8480 rubles.
For 2023, only a semi-annual subscription is available – the cost is 4240 rubles.
To subscribe, send us a free-form short application to medart777@yandex.ru, indicating your full name and personal details, or the name of the organization with details.An invoice will be issued, after payment of which the subscription will begin to operate.

Attention authors!

At the request of authors who wish to purchase a printed version of the journal with their publication as a keepsake or as a gift, we inform you that this is possible on an individual order. The  "Medicine and Art" is an electronic journal. The cost of 1 copy is 5000 rubles (exclusive issue in a small circulation).

4 issues a year.
 

Stuart John Sonic Age Ltd


ORCID:0000-0002-6939-7451

Azymov Rinat Academy of Medical Rehabilitation, Clinical Psychology and Music Therapy (Consultant)


ORCID:0000-0002-8313-2089

Allik Tatyana The medical and rehabilitation center for music therapy and corrective pedagogy "Doctor Music from Estonia OÜ" (director)

Arun Dubey R.M.T. Kala Sangeet University

Asatryan Anna Grigor'evna NAS RA Institute of Arts (Director)
doctor of art criticism

professor

ORCID:0000-0002-0023-1752

Belousova Marina KSMA - Branch Campus of the FSBEI FPE RMACPE MOH, Kazan, Russia (the department of psychotherapy and narcology, assistant professor)
candidate of medical sciences


ORCID:0000-0002-8804-8118

Gordeeva Tatyana Kazan State Institute of Culture (professor)
doctor of cultural sciences

professor

ORCID:0000-0002-9272-9610

Eremina Natalya Academy of Medical Rehabilitation, Clinical Psychology and Music Therapy (vice-rector)
candidate of psychological sciences

professor

Zakharova Liudmila Institute of Developmental Biology named after A.I. N.K. Koltsov RAS (Chief Researcher)
doctor of biological sciences

professor

Klyuev Aleksandr Russian State Pedagogical University named after A. Hertzen (professor)
doctor of philosophical sciences

professor

Kopytin Aleksandr St. Petersburg Academy of Postgraduate Pedagogical Education (Professor)
doctor of medical sciences

professor

Kotrbova Kvetoslava Univerzita Komenského (Department of Therapeutic Pedagogy)
doctor of pedagogical sciences

Nabat Anna Kazan State Medical University (Assistant)
candidate of medical sciences


ORCID:0000-0001-8563-8908

Petuhov Sergey Institute of Machines Science named after A.A.Blagonravov of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Laboratory of Biomechanical Systems, Head of the Laboratory)
doctor of physical and mathematical sciences

Podosenina Natal'ya

Reid John Stuart Sonic Age Ltd


ORCID:0000-0002-6939-7451

Starokozhko Leonid Stavropol State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia
doctor of medical sciences

professor

Hrustalev Nikolay Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine, Clinical Psychology,and Music Therapy (The «Medicine and Art» journal correspondent)

Chernikova Ekaterina Academy of Medical Rehabilitation, Clinical Psychology and Music Therapy (Psychologist, Certified music therapist, Speech therapist)


ORCID:0000-0002-8574-1419

Shevchenko Aleksandr Volgograd State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Department of Medicine Technologies)
doctor of pharmaceutical sciences

professor

• « 
• 1
• 2
•  »